RESEARCH LAB

IP Geolocation Accuracy Lab

Compare current provider results side by side. The lab reports agreement and disagreement without pretending that agreement is the same thing as physical-location accuracy.

Live provider comparisonIPv4 + IPv6
✓ Country/region/city agreement✓ Coordinate gap✓ Raw provider labels

What this lab measures

This live lab compares the current location values returned by the configured core and advanced IP data providers for the same IP address. It reports field agreement and coordinate distance. It is useful for understanding provider consistency.

This is not a benchmark against known physical ground truth. Two providers can agree and still be wrong. A proper accuracy study requires a controlled dataset where the true network/device location is independently known.

How to read the result

Country agreement is generally more meaningful than city agreement because city-level IP mapping is more sensitive to ISP routing, gateways and provider methodology. If providers disagree on city but agree on country, the sensible interpretation is that the country result is more consistent than the city result—not that either city is certainly correct.

Our research roadmap

The research hub is designed to publish reproducible tests rather than invented accuracy percentages. Future benchmark datasets should document sampling, network types, geography, date collected, ground-truth method and provider versions so results can be evaluated and repeated.

Use the methodology

If you reference an IP-Lookup.com comparison externally, describe the metric as provider agreement. Do not describe it as GPS accuracy or a probability of a person's location.